We're now beginning to see, in some places, the threats and intimidation we face being merely for being cyclists challenged, at least sometimes. Its a start - but we've got a long way to go.
As I'd like to live long enough to see cyclists in the UK treated as valued human beings rather than targets waiting to be killed I'm going to propose that we need to learn a lesson from the '80s 'political correctness' movement. We need to start coming down hard on those who seek to stereotype or apply any potentially damaging or divisive generalisations about us.
If you're old enough you'll recall that way back in the 1970's it was very common for folk to make jokes about black or asian people. While the individual jokes might have seemed harmless enough, the cumulative effect was shocking. For example, while no one would have suggested that seeing an episode of Love Thy Neighbour (ridiculed by Bill Bryson when he disparagingly referred to it as 'My Neighbour is a Darkie') made viewers racist, its certainly true that the jokes from it were repeated over and over again in schoolyards across the UK, creating a climate where kids from ethnic backgrounds could be made to feel crappy. Racism was treated as a bit of a joke, and well into the '80s non whites in the UK were expected to just laugh off what could often be very sinister, even violent humour - which created a climate where seriously unpleasant racism could perpetuate under the guise of humour. If you were witty enough to be funny too you could make whatever jokes about blacks (and asians, gays, whoever else) you liked. And make no mistake - in this climate of sick humour, the racists were able to make the lives of those from ethnic minorities very hard indeed, with the already blurry line between humour and abuse being easy to exploit, those who would carry that further on into assault did so.
Then the UK started to grow up. At least a bit. You can see this reflected in the more PC humour of the '80s (although it took longer for comedy to stop mocking gay folk so much than it did black folk) - and while only a fool would say that all of our racist problems disappeared, it became no longer fashionable to have black folk as the butt of humour just because of their skin colour. It was a long slog, but things got better - they moved in the right direction.
I would like to suggest that cyclists are, at least in terms of 'humour', where non-white folk were in the '70s. Is this linked to the fact that piss poor excuses for killing cyclists are routinely accepted by our courts? You can start a conversation with a complete stranger by complaining about 'bloody cyclists'. We're mocked, ridiculed, or just outright hated by journalists and columnists who think nothing about calling for our executions. I would argue that these are all just different parts of the same phenomenon - its cool to hate cyclists. Its easy to get a laugh by pouring hate on an acceptable social out-group. Yes, that would be us.
And no, I'm not suggesting that this is quite the same thing as racism - but when you read some of the articles directed at us, its not a dissimilar phenomenon. We need to change that. We need to oppose it. We need to counter it. We need to make hatred based on the fact that we're making a fairly harmless decision to use a bike to get around - a decision that isn't about anyone else, doesn't really concern anyone else, doesn't even impact significantly on others - a thing of the past. We have to stamp up and down on prejudice based on how we travel - we must make it unacceptable. Every. Single. Time.
And I know some will read this and say 'but you'll just make things worse, militant cyclists...' Yeah, yeah. Same thing was said by those who didn't approve of making racist humour a thing of the past. They were wrong too - prejudice is prejudice, and appeasing it never defeats it. Fighting it, at every opportunity, defeats it.
So this is my call to arms - next time you see someone harmlessly perpetrating an anti-cyclist stereotype, challenge them. Defeat them. Don't accept that you're being a 'militant cyclist' when you're quite reasonably challenging hate. And if you're a cyclist who goes along with this hate because its easier? You're our enemy too. In fact, you might be worse.
It's important not to take this analogy too far. A crucial difference is that it's easy for cyclists to "pass". Once we get off the bike and take off our silly clothing, then no-one can tell that we're members of a despised minority.
ReplyDeleteUnless people know you cycle, or you mention it. And why should you hide it? It's good stuff. I once had a colleage tell me "I saw one of your lot on the pavement today blah blah blah" and he meant a bicycle rider, pure and simple. The phrase "your lot" is chilling (especially if you experienced the mid-late 20th Century bigotry that Cab refers to) and is exactly someone "taking the analogy too far".
DeleteAlso worse - the "get our own house in order" argument. Again, like stereotyping, collective responsibility perpetuates that 1970's state of affairs you describe. Collective responsibility is as much an unacceptable token of persecution as stereotyping.
ReplyDeleteGareth, women wearing trousers was once looked upon as silly cyclist clothing. Those cyclists didn't in the end get out of a despised minority by removing their garb: they overcame prejudice.
ReplyDeleteYou seem to be reading something into my comment that I didn't say or mean. I'm not suggesting that anti-cyclist prejudice doesn't exist (obviously it does), just that it's different from some other kinds of prejudice in that have ways of escaping it. We're not a "protected class" in civil rights language. The women of the rational dress movement faced prejudice in every area of the lives, not just when they were riding bikes.
DeleteWhile I get what you're saying, I don't give a damn. So if I hide the fact that I'm a cyclist people don't hate me... So its not like being black, its like being gay? Screw that for a game of soldiers.
DeleteCyclist? Don't ask, don't tell?
DeleteAmen!
ReplyDeleteBlimey! I have been saying this for years.
ReplyDeleteOf course, to take on the most common argument I get when saying this sort of thing: people are born into ethic minorities or gender, maybe sexuality, but not into being cyclists. It is self-selecting.
BUT:
(a) So is motoring
(b) the real problem with negative attitudes towards blacks, gays etc. is when it backs up danger towards these groups. Being made to "feel crappy" is a minor part of it. Driving is dangerous enough to start off with - you have to work at it to not be dangerous, so a negative and incorrect stereotype is exacerbating that danger. In fact it is not too strong to say that in some ways, this kind of negative stereotyping is MORE DANGEROUS than all the other usual prejudices because most people are not going to find it inherently easy to cause danger to people because they are black, women, gays etc.
Add to this that bigotry makes people feel uncomfortable ("crappy") and puts them off cycling.
Dr Robert Davis, Chair Road Danger Reduction Forum
I've been saying it for a very long time too - but its taken me until now to write it down.
DeleteStrikes me that yes, the view of cyclists as 'other' brings with it all sorts of problems. Ever had the thing where you've turned up at some function or other, a stranger discovers you came by bike and they try hard to hide their nose crinkling up in disgust? Its the same basic response you see whenever hate is based purely on prejudice. And its a hell of a thing to fix.
This is ridiculous and pretty damn offensive to those that suffer from racism.
ReplyDeleteNonsense. I've heard the same thing I'm saying from cyclists who are visibly of ethnic minorities - and you'll note if you read my blog post above I specifically state that this is not the same as racism, merely a similar phenomenon. Do you suggest that ignorant prejudices work by different phenomena ?
DeleteAnd I've heard women cyclists say that they get abuse for being women and for being cyclists.
ReplyDeleteI have seen "but racism" being used to excuse abusing cyclists before; once it became obvious that the cyclists in question couldn't possibly have seen the bus driver's skin colour before allegedly shouting racist abuse, and he couldn't have heard them if they did, the court took a dim view of his lying.
That sort of behaviour does nothing to help the genuine problems of racism, and nor does Anonymous' comment.
Has the term cyclism ever been used before? Perhaps we should try to get this into common usage?
ReplyDeletehttp://www.camcycle.org.uk/newsletters/53/article11.html
Delete'Motorism' has been around for a while - even 'Institutional Motorism'
http://takethelanes.blogspot.co.uk/p/about-motorism.html
http://takethelanes.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/the-only-ism-in-village.html